HFN Login and Registration
LOGIN PASSWORD
Need Help? Register here
Skip Navigation Links
Home
About HFN
News
Funds
Investor Tools
Manager Services
Data Services
Research
Service Providers
Conferences
Help
HedgeFund.net: Public news from HedgeNews
Sign Up for the HFN Daily Newsletter         |    Take a Tour of the HFN Website    |    Register      |         Login
Hedgefund.net Register Here
Click below for information on membership options
Premium Access Manager Services Data Services
Asset Flow Report View Front Page  
Share |
  Subscribe

US Atty Makes First New Arrest in Madoff Case
by Paula Schaap ,Senior Reporter , March 18, 2009

Although Bernard Madoff handed himself into the FBI on Dec. 11 with the astonishing confession that he had run a $65 billion Ponzi scheme for decades, no other arrests had been made in the case. That was even after Madoff pleaded guilty on March 12 to 11 counts of fraud and was sent to jail. Despite the longevity and breadth of the scam, no one else had faced justice.

That changed on Wednesday when Madoff’s accountant, David Friehling, 49, was arrested and charged with crimes for accounting violations.

“Mr. Friehling is charged with crimes that represent a serious breach of the investing public’s trust,” Lev Dassin, who heads up the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York, said in a statement.

An attorney for Friehling did not return a call from HedgeFund.net.

After Madoff was arrested, news reports came out that the auditor for his business was Friehling & Horowitz, a two-man accounting firm in New City, N.Y. Jeremy Horowitz was Friehling’s father-in-law, who handed over the business to him in the early 1990’s when he retired. Horowitz, who was in his 80’s, recently died, according to The New York Times.

There has been speculation that Madoff could not have acted alone to keep his scheme going for so long and with so many investors.

“I don’t understand why conspiracy wasn’t part of the plea,” Mr. Newberger, a Madoff investor said in a statement to the federal court judge who oversaw Madoff’s guilty plea. “Just to produce the reams of documents must have required armies of people to produce.”

Nonetheless, Dassin said in his statement that Friehling was not being charged with knowledge that Madoff was running a Ponzi scheme. But the government said Friehling did not verify whether the transactions Madoff said he made were actually done, yet he certified to investors and the Securities and Exchange Commission that he had properly completed his audits.

Irving Picard, the trustee in charge of liquidating Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities Inc. (BLMIS), has told investors the statements they received showing securities transactions were entirely fictitious.

Paul Radvany, a professor at Fordham Law School and a former federal prosecutor said, “All prosecutors have become attuned to the fact that accountants pay a vital role in our society in assuring that companies abide by certain rules.”

“A lot of times these frauds could not have been done without accountants agreeing to certain financial statements,” Radvany said.

Another factor that may have weighed in the government’s decision to prosecute the accountant was the many years that Friehling worked as the auditor for BLMIS, Radvany said. The government claimed that the accountant certified BLMIS’ audits from 1998 to 2008.

At the same time Friehling and his wife kept an account with BLMIS that had a balance of more than $500,000, which compromised his independence, prosecutors alleged.

Friehling was paid about $12,000 to $14,500 per month between 2004 and 2007 for his accounting and auditing services, according to the government.

If he is convicted, Friehling faces up to 105 years in prison.

  
Recent Articles 
HFN Spotlight
POLL OF THE WEEK
July 27, 2010

 
 
5 Comments
Post your comments below.
POSTED BY Paula Schaap at 3/18/2009 2:07:54 PM

The Judicial system is missing the boat on this one. There is a deal that should be made with Madoff.

Make Madoff a deal he will not refuse.

The objective is NOT revenge, but Restitution and Reconstruction.
POSTED BY James Raider at 3/18/2009 2:46:02 PM

@ James , you have to be kidding. There's no restitution here the money is all gone. The best solution is revenge by putting him in prison with murderers and rapists who will administer justice on a daily basis.
POSTED BY arnie houser at 3/19/2009 6:50:40 AM

If restitution is the only punishment, how is that going to deter other people doing the same as him?
POSTED BY Naked at 3/23/2009 9:10:02 PM

Excellent article, I will take note. Many thanks for the story!
POSTED BY Cialis at 3/9/2010 1:20:00 AM
Add your Comments:
 Name: Required
 Email: Required(will not be published)
All comments will be reviewed for appropriateness, length and lucidity.
 
 

Disclaimer: An affiliated broker-dealer of HedgeFund.net is compensated for providing capital introduction services to hedge funds and hedge fund managers, which may include one or more hedge funds mentioned in this article. Hedge funds and/or hedge fund managers mentioned in this article also may compensate HedgeFund.net for services provided to them by HedgeFund.net













 HOME    HEDGEPLUS    HEDGENEWS    PORTFOLIOS    FUNDS    PERTRAC ONLINE               Copyright 2010, Channel Capital Group Inc. All Rights Reserved.   
NEITHER CHANNEL CAPITAL GROUP INC.("CCG"),ITS AFFILIATES,OR CCG'S OR ITS AFFILIATES RESPECTIVE OFFICERS,DIRECTORS,AGENTS,MEMBERS,SHAREHOLDERS AND EMPLOYEES (EACH A "CCG PARTY" AND COLLECTIVELY THE "CCG PARTIES")RECOMMENDS OR SOLICITS ANY INVESTMENT BY USERS OF THIS WEB SITE,THE MATERIAL CONTAINED HEREIN IS BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY HEDGE FUND MANAGERS AND OTHER SOURCES. THE CCG PARTIES HAVE NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED SUCH INFORMATION,DO NOT REPRESENT IT AS ACCURATE ,TRUE OR COMPLETE, MAKE NO WARRENTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED REGARDING IT AND SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSSED,DAMAGES,COSTS, OR EXPENSES RELATING TO ITS ADEQUANCY ,ACCURACY ,TRUTH ,COMPLETENESS, OR USE, REGISTERED USERS SHOULD NOT RELY UPON DATA TO MAKE AN INVESTMENT DECISION ,AND SHOULD NOT THAT PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT AN INDICATION OF FUTURE.